Lesson 3: Enhancing Coordination

Lesson Overview

In emergency situations, inter-agency coordination is vital. In this lesson, you will learn how to build and strengthen relationships with key organizations for more seamless functioning. These best practices for fostering relationships, highlighting actions to be taken before emergencies occur, are an important component to overall preparedness.

Upon completion of this lesson, you will be able to:
  • Understand the benefits of relationship building between sectors.
  • Identify immediate action items to improve the overall response effort of drinking water and wastewater utilities and EMAs.
Best Practices to Enhance Coordination

When an emergency strikes, the staff at drinking water and wastewater utilities will be the points of contact for EMAs. Staff can include part-time, full-time and contract employees. Depending on the size of the utility, staff may include chemists, engineers, environmental professionals, systems analysts, microbiologists, public relations people, security personnel and other specialists who are highly trained in their roles individually and as a team. To leverage existing regulatory considerations and prepare for the various community-wide impacts from an emergency, there are specific actions EMAs and drinking water and wastewater utilities can take to increase coordination, efficacy and efficiency.

These include:


Building Relationships

icon
Coordinating Planning


Sharing Emergency Capabilities

icon
Developing Joint Messages

icon
Issuing Access Credentials

icon
Knowing When to Involve Law Enforcement


Best Practice 1: Build Relationships

EMA staff and drinking water and wastewater utility operators all work to support and secure the health and safety of the community.

  • Drinking water and wastewater utilities strive to provide safe water and sanitation services through effective preparedness and security practices.
  • EMAs ensure timely, coordinated emergency response by increasing the preparedness and resilience of personnel and operational capabilities to all-hazards.

In both mission areas, preparedness refers to actions taken to plan, organize, equip, train and exercise to build and sustain capabilities necessary to prevent, protect against, mitigate the effects of, respond to and recover from threats that pose the greatest risk.

Building relationships and bridging the gap between these two mission areas before an emergency occurs can minimize impacts to drinking water, wastewater and emergency services.


Actions to Build Relationships
The following actions can be taken today to build relationships (click each button to expand):
 

Share contact information:

Invite drinking water and wastewater utilities to participate in joint trainings, exercises, emergency response group meetings as well as the LEPC or TEPC. This can be a good way to share day-to-day and emergency contact information and begin forging relationships. Coordination with LEPCs is also now a requirement in developing an ERP for certain community water systems under AWIA.

Membership in LEPCs or TEPCs should involve all community members such as elected local and state officials; police, fire, civil defense and public health professionals; environment, transportation and hospital officials; facility representatives—including EMAs and the water sector.


Tour drinking water and wastewater utilities:

Drinking water and wastewater utilities can give EMA staff tours of their facilities to allow a better understanding about how drinking water and wastewater utilities operate and what their needs may be during an emergency.

In both drinking water and wastewater utilities, the resources will vary based on utility size. In a small, rural area, there may be one utility manager who oversees a variety of roles. In a large, urban area, there may be specialized staff equipped to handle facility operations and to coordinate with local response partners. Knowledge of utility size and structure is key to building staff relationships.


Give water utilities access to Emergency Operations Centers (EOCs):

When an incident occurs and an EOC is activated, emergency professionals at the EOC will coordinate efforts to:

  • Assess damage
  • Secure utilities and lifelines
  • Open roads
  • Manage environmental and safety hazards
  • Manage resources
  • Secure facilities

EMAs can give water utilities access to the EOC, including access to online systems like WebEOC. Water utilities in some areas staff “water desks” in the EOC during emergencies. This creates the opportunity for better relationships during disasters.

Case Study 1: Relationship Building at Portland Water Bureau

The Portland Bureau of Emergency Management (PBEM) and the Portland Water Bureau (PWB) have a strong relationship. They plan and participate in joint exercises, including a multi-jurisdictional region-wide Cascadia Rising functional exercise. This training exercise was designed to test response to a Cascadia subduction zone earthquake and its expected damage, including a large devastating coastal tsunami. PWB consulted with PBEM in designing the PWB exercise plan, and the two bureaus held trainings together.

Participating in joint exercises provided the foundation to respond to a 30-inch, 104-year-old water main break that carried water from a reservoir to Northeast Portland. Under pressure, the water quickly filled the street and surrounding lawns, flooded basements and spread out over several blocks, creating hazards for pedestrians and drivers.

During the event, PWB, the Bureau of Environmental Services (BES), and PBEM staffed and managed the incident from the scene and remotely, providing ongoing real-time status updates. PWB crews, directors of operations, maintenance and construction, an emergency manager and two public information officers staffed the field EOC. An additional PWB public information officer and emergency manager and other PWB staff kept information flowing from off site. All three bureaus provided incident responders and drafted reports for bureau managers, providing updates throughout the incident to maintain communication.


key takeaway Key Takeaway
  • Establish connections and exchange contact information prior to an incident. This will allow emergency actors to interface effectively and respond quickly to the emergency.

Best Practice 2: Coordinate Planning

Drinking water and wastewater utilities and EMAs can coordinate planning to save resources and identify gaps through:

  • ERPs
  • Emergency Operations Plans
  • Hazard Mitigation Plans
  • LEPCs
  • Training and Exercises
Cross-Sector Coordination to Develop an ERP

Both sectors can share their ERPs and Emergency Operations Plans (EOPs). These emergency plans include the roles and responsibilities of the parties involved, as well as logistical challenges that may arise in the event of an emergency. For example, logistics for providing emergency drinking water and sanitation services are important to coordinate before disaster strikes.

The EOPs are intended to be a guide to manage risk and offer guidance based on the nature and extent of an event or incident. It is not a script to be followed exactly in every event, but rather the starting point for organized operational activity. The plan identifies the emergency response policies, describes the response organization and assigns roles and responsibilities for all emergency management activities related to an event. 

In both sectors, EOPs should coincide with community-wide EOPs and with other emergency plans in order to ensure compatibility across organizations. Other local emergency management plans can include: 

  • Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP)
  • Continuity of Government Plan (COG)
  • Local or Regional Evacuation Plan
  • Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan (NHMP)
  • Flood Response Plan
  • Temporary Disaster Housing Plan
  • National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
  • NFIP Community Rating System
  • Functional Needs Populations Plan

Drinking water and wastewater utilities can also work with their local EMAs on developing hazard mitigation projects and applying for funding opportunities, specifically FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. 



important point
  • EPA developed the document, Planning for an Emergency Drinking Water Supply, to help drinking water and wastewater utilities respond to large-scale disasters by developing an emergency drinking water supply plan that utilizes all planning partners.

Coordinate Planning through Training and Exercises

Conducting joint exercises provides a great opportunity to both build relationships and coordinate planning.

Drinking water and wastewater utilities and EMAs should include roles for each other in their exercises to increase the exchange of information and help solve problems across sectors. Water utilities and EMAs can also consider conducting a tabletop exercise. Tabletop exercises are discussion-based sessions where participants meet in an informal, classroom setting to discuss their roles before, during and after an emergency.

Joint exercises provide the opportunity to get to know the staff responsible for responding to an incident—this is equally important in small, medium or large utilities. The resources and challenges experienced by an individual system are unique and will present the opportunity for different methods for how to conduct training and exercises.



important point
  • EPA offers a Training & Exercise Plan guide that provides an overview of different types of training and exercises and a multi-year training plan template as well as an online Tabletop Exercise tool. These tools provide the foundation to plan, conduct and evaluate tabletop exercises.

Case Study 2: Funding through Planning in Phoenix
The Phoenix Wastewater Treatment Plant was at risk of flooding and severe erosion. Flooding could overwhelm the bank of the Salt River and result in damage to several physical elements (e.g., channels, chlorine contact chambers and holding ponds) of the wastewater treatment plant.

The utility and the city coordinated with the Maricopa County Department of Emergency Management on potential hazard mitigation options.

This coordination helped the utility to receive funding from FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program to reduce the future threat of flooding and severe erosion.


important point


key takeaway Key Takeaway
  • Coordinate with local emergency planning entities (e.g., Department of Emergency Management) to identify opportunities for mitigation measures. This can help streamline the planning process, including the application of available funding programs.


Best Practice 3: Share Emergency Capabilities

EMAs and drinking water and wastewater utilities can share information on their emergency procedures and capabilities including:

  • How to request resources during emergencies and the protocol for activating the EOC
  • Back-up generator and fuel supply needs during crises
  • Mutual aid agreements, including membership in respective state Water and Wastewater Agency Response Networks (WARNs)

Drinking water and wastewater utilities can also identify procedures for taking advantage of state-to-state assistance, including the Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC).

Taking these steps to share emergency procedures and capabilities will increase drinking water and wastewater utility and EMA access to resources and improve overall response.


Intrastate Mutual Aid and Assistance: WARN

Drinking water and wastewater utilities can share emergency capabilities even further through local mutual aid agreements, such as WARNs. WARNs are intrastate networks of “utilities helping utilities” that can help respond to and recover from an incident affecting the water sector through the sharing of specialized resources and personnel. These networks are centered around a mutual aid and assistance agreement, which describes the administrative framework through which support is provided.

There are WARNs established in 49 states and the National Capital Region and their members consist of drinking water and wastewater utilities, public and private, large and small. In many cases, WARN associate members include primacy agencies, state EMAs and water association representatives.

The benefits of WARNs are numerous. WARNs work to:

  • Reduce the burden on state and federal response.
  • Fill the gap between disaster onset and the arrival of aid.
  • Ensure the right resources with the right skills are available.
  • Enhance planning and coordination.
  • Provide utilities with up-to-date emergency contact lists.
  • Reduce administrative conflict.


important point
  • You can find more information about how to join a WARN here.


Case Study 3: North Carolina EOC Activation and Intrastate Mutual Aid During Hurricane Florence

Hurricane Florence made landfall on the North Carolina coast in early September 2018. In response, the North Carolina EOC was activated to alleviate potential impacts from the hurricane. Due to potential water sector impacts, the state requested assistance at the EOC from EPA Region 4 water division personnel. Quick activation at the EOC was made possible from day-to-day relationships between EPA Region 4 and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). These pre-event personal and professional relationships strengthened communication and collaboration in the early phases of the response. Once the EOC was activated, daily summary reports were provided by NCDEQ to EPA on drinking water systems and were used for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Homeland Security daily situation reports.

In addition to EOC activation, water sector mutual aid organizations shared emergency capabilities during the response. NCWaterWARN and the NC Rural Water Association (NCRWA) were provided a workspace in the state’s EOC during the response to ensure coordination of aid to affected facilities. Throughout the response, NCRWA generated a list of facilities they were assisting and provided the list to EPA and NCDEQ. These mutual aid networks provided water and wastewater line repair staff, generators, fuel and other forms of aid through their members. As a result, very few resource requests for the water sector were made of the state EOC, and even fewer federal resources were deployed to assist the water sector.


key takeaway Key Takeaway
  • Provide a space at the state EOC for water sector response personnel to generate and maintain a list of facilities that require assistance. Maintain transparency with local mutual aid networks and the state emergency management department to ensure timely delivery of equipment and reduce redundancies.



Interstate Mutual Aid and Assistance: EMAC

Interstate mutual aid and assistance offers the exchange of resources and capabilities from state-to-state. A type of interstate mutual aid and assistance is EMAC. EMAC is facilitated by the National Emergency Management Association (NEMA). EMAC facilitates the mobilization of response resources and support between states. EMAC acts as a complement to the federal disaster response system and can be used either in lieu of or in conjunction with federal assistance. EMAC allows states to maximize the use of available resources by sending personnel, equipment and commodities to other states to help disaster relief during governor-declared states of emergencies. EMAC, established in 1996, is the only congressionally ratified mutual aid and assistance compact between all 50 states, DC, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico and Guam. NEMA administers EMAC to support water utilities in the following ways:

  • Provides the means to deploy utility assets across state lines quickly and effectively during a declared emergency

  • Provides liability and other legal protections for deployed utility staff and equipment

  • Provides reciprocity for licenses and certifications during deployment

EMAC logo 


EMAC in Action

The graphic below outlines the five steps of EMAC assistance.

A state's governor declares an emergency or disaster, activating EMAC.
The affected state requests resources through EMAC. The assisting states prepare and make offers of assistance.
Once an offer is accepted, an agreement called a Request for Assistance (REQ A) is prepared and signed by both states.
If approved, responding resources assemble into teams (mobilize), travel to the incident site (deploy) and come home (demobilize) when the mission is complete.
The requesting state reimburses the assisting state.

How to Implement EMAC

For water utilities to use EMAC they must first:

  • Learn more about EMAC. This includes understanding the resource request processes at the local, county and state level; prioritization and resource tracking activities; and how to work with their designated WARN representative for the state EMA.

  • Meet with local, county and state EMAs. This step will foster relationships within the sector and allow for enhanced response between EMAC and the water sector. Speaking with local, county and state EMAs will help determine how best to implement EMAC.

  • Determine how best to coordinate. Building a foundation between the water and emergency services sector is imperative to effective emergency response. Conducting joint trainings and exercises with EMA and water sector personnel is a great way to identify how to best coordinate between the water sector and emergency services sector and can help water utilities stay familiar with EMAC procedures and protocols. These may already be hosted by your local and state EMAs.


important point


Case Study 4: Hurricane Irma EMAC Activation

On September 10, 2017, Hurricane Irma made landfall at Cudjoe Key in the Florida Keys as a Category 4 storm with 130 mph winds. Two days later, the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority (FKAA) completed a damage assessment and requested assistance from Florida WARN (FlaWARN). FKAA’s request was one of 130 requests for assistance that FlaWARN received following Hurricane Irma.

Over 90 percent of Florida utilities were impacted by Hurricane Irma and the only utilities available to assist were from the northwestern part of the state. FKAA was in urgent need of water distribution crews to make repairs to 117 miles of service lines to restore service.

When the request came in, FlaWARN was not able to fulfill the needs of other utilities in the State. FKAA’s request was large both in physical size and in the number of people affected. On September 13, 2020, FlaWARN helped prepare an EMAC request to specific states for equipment and personnel. FlaWARN provided the request to the state EMA for distribution. In response, FKAA received support from six crews from Tennessee, three crews from South Carolina and one crew from North Carolina.


key takeaway Key Takeaway
  • Identify a central contact person to submit an EMAC request (interstate) and determine which states to submit the request to through your WARN network (intrastate).


Best Practice 4: Develop Joint Messages


important point
  • For example, EPA's Drinking Water Cyanotoxin Communication Toolbox provides actionable tools for preparing for and responding to a harmful algal bloom incident. It contains templates for communicating risk before, during, and after an event. These materials, developed with stakeholder input, are intended to support public water systems, states and local governments in developing their own risk communication materials.

The benefits of having this messaging ready to deploy include:

  • Consistent messaging for communities;
  • Broader message distribution; and
  • More accurate information.

The type of information shared can include:

  • Updates to damage assessment;
  • Strategies or plans for recovery;
  • Specific resource needs; and 
  • Changes to service levels.
For example, community members may call their local health department for information about health risks related to an incident they learned about on the local news. Coordinating in advance ensures the public hears consistent messages, helping them understand the risks and how to best manage them.

Case Study 5: Chapel Hill, NC

In November of 2016, the Orange County Health Department, Orange Water and Sewer Authority (OWASA), local EMA and hospital in Chapel Hill, North Carolina participated in a joint exercise to prepare for water service emergencies and increase overall community emergency resilience. This training soon proved valuable when a 12-inch main break occurred in February 2017 at OWASA and led to Orange County activating its EOC.

The relationships built from the joint exercise several months earlier provided the tools necessary to properly communicate this emergency with the affected customers. All key actors in the area issued "Do Not Use, Do Not Drink" notices to their customers. This joint messaging led to customers reducing consumption by 37 percent.

decorative 


key takeaway Key Takeaway
  • Know your response partners through joint exercises, and be transparent and consistent with the community through joint messaging.


Best Practice 5: Issue Access Credentials

Drinking water and wastewater utility operators and personnel are often overlooked as essential workers. This challenge can delay drinking water and wastewater employees accessing their facilities during an emergency. Water utility workers need to get to and repair their facilities quickly after a disaster. State and local EMAs could consider issuing responder ID cards to water utility staff. Issuing access credentials promotes quicker community recovery.

The Crisis Event Response and Recovery Access (CERRA) Framework guides the implementation of a common access and re-entry approach and is intended to be a voluntary guide for managing access into and transit through restricted areas or emergency zones by enhancing existing emergency preparedness plans. The CERRA Framework focuses on supporting state, local, and regional efforts to enable the successful transit and access of critical response and recovery resources before, during and after emergencies.


CERRA Framework Stakeholders

The Framework outlines three critical stakeholder groups that require access during an emergency:

Mouseover to explore.

All three stakeholder groups should enhance their existing emergency preparedness plans by coordinating with local authorities, emergency managers and law enforcement to define access rules and authorization procedures and determine enforcement restrictions during an emergency.


Case Study 6: Issuing Access Credentials in Utah

In Utah, the Rural Water Association, the Utah WARN, and the Department of Environmental Quality developed a solution to the challenges of emergency response credentialing. The organizations created a state-wide Water and Wastewater Emergency Response ID Badge that also serves as a local system identification badge. The badges contain identifying information about the individual as well as the organization they work for. The badges enable law enforcement to quickly verify water response staff who are coming to assist during an emergency.

emergency personnel

key takeaway Key Takeaway
  • Prepare state-wide ID badges to label water sector staff, among other critical infrastructure operators, as essential for quick verification during an emergency.


Case Study 7: Defining Essential Workers

In March of 2020, states across the US enacted policies to curb the spread of the global coronavirus disease (COVID-19). In order to ensure critical services during this time, the Department of Homeland Security published an Advisory Memorandum On Identification Of Essential Critical Infrastructure Workers During COVID-19 Response guidance and accompanying list intended to support state, local, and industry partners in identifying the critical infrastructure sectors and their essential workers. This guidance recognized critical infrastructure, including drinking water and wastewater utility staff and their suppliers and manufacturers, as part of the critical infrastructure workforce. To support water sector response, EPA sent a letter to governors in all 50 states, territories, tribes and Washington, DC, requesting that water and wastewater workers, as well as the manufacturers and suppliers who provide vital services and materials to the water sector, be considered essential workers and businesses by state authorities. EPA provided a template that states, tribes, localities, water utilities and technical assistance providers can use to provide documentation to workers that are considered essential.


key takeaway Key Takeaway
  • Collaborate with the state LEPC before a disaster to determine a list of recognized essential workers, including water and wastewater utility staff.


Best Practice 6: Know When to Involve Law Enforcement

The emergency services sector is a network of services that provides many functions, including law enforcement. In certain situations, drinking water and wastewater utilities may need both law enforcement and EMA help. It is time to call local law enforcement when a utility operator or manager notices:

  • Unusual or suspicious behavior;
  • Unusual questions about water facilities;
  • Tampering of fences, locks or gates;
  • Abandoned items;
  • Unknown vehicles;
  • Facility surveillance; and/or
  • Cyber attacks.


important point


Critical Role of Law Enforcement

Law enforcement provides a critical role in threat identification and information sharing, as well as pre-incident prevention and post-incident investigation. Drinking water and wastewater utilities can coordinate with local law enforcement by:

  • Working to identify critical assets.
  • Sharing critical asset information including the location of pumping stations or water towers that might be in remote parts of the system. Officers on patrol can help watch for any suspicious activities at these sites.
  • Discussing the response measures outlined in the water utility’s ERP and communicating how law enforcement can be used to protect a specific utility..

With this knowledge, EMAs can better understand when a disaster or malevolent act has threatened the safety of a system and the customers that rely on it.

 

Lesson Summary

In this lesson you learned how to build and strengthen relationships with key organizations for more seamless functioning. These best practices for fostering relationships, highlighting actions to be taken before emergencies occur, are an important component to overall preparedness. You should now be able to:

  • Understand the benefits of relationship building between sectors.
  • Identify immediate action items to improve the overall response effort of drinking water and wastewater utilities and EMAs.